Re: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft

[Ian Stanley <ian.b.stanley at team.telstra.com>]

Title: Re: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft

I support this.

Cheers
ian


On 6/5/08 8:08 AM, "George Swallow" <swallow at cisco.com> wrote:George Swallow

> This begins a one week poll to determine support for making
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-andersson-mpls-expbits-def-00.txt
>
> a WG doc.
>
> As background, early in the MPLS work, these bits were always intend for
> various uses as COS bits and other functions imbedded in the DS byte of the
> IP header.  They were called experimental only in that, at the time the
> encaps draft was written, there was no consensus on what to do with the
> bits.
>
> The term experimental has lead various people and SDOs to expect more
> freedom in defining these bits than ever was intended.  This draft seeks to
> correct that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


 
Regards,
Ian Stanley
Architecture Implementation
Network Technology | Engineering
02 9396 8508
0419 257221

This communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL or copyright information of Telstra Corporation Limited (ABN 33 051 775 556). If you are not an intended recipient, you MUST NOT keep, forward, copy, use, save or rely on this communication, and any such action is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to this email to notify the sender of its incorrect delivery, and then delete both it and your reply. Thank you.
 



_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls