Re: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft

["Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali at cisco.com>]

In favor. 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of George Swallow (swallow)
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 6:09 PM
> To: mpls at ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft
> 
> This begins a one week poll to determine support for making
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-andersson-mpls-expbits-def-00.txt
> 
> a WG doc.
> 
> As background, early in the MPLS work, these bits were always 
> intend for various uses as COS bits and other functions 
> imbedded in the DS byte of the IP header.  They were called 
> experimental only in that, at the time the encaps draft was 
> written, there was no consensus on what to do with the bits.
> 
> The term experimental has lead various people and SDOs to 
> expect more freedom in defining these bits than ever was 
> intended.  This draft seeks to correct that.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls