Re: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft

[Luca Martini <lmartini at cisco.com>]

Yes, I am in favor of making this a WG draft.

Luca




George Swallow wrote:
> This begins a one week poll to determine support for making
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-andersson-mpls-expbits-def-00.txt
>
> a WG doc.
>
> As background, early in the MPLS work, these bits were always intend for
> various uses as COS bits and other functions imbedded in the DS byte of the
> IP header.  They were called experimental only in that, at the time the
> encaps draft was written, there was no consensus on what to do with the
> bits.
>
> The term experimental has lead various people and SDOs to expect more
> freedom in defining these bits than ever was intended.  This draft seeks to
> correct that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>   

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls