Re: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft

[Monique Morrow <mmorrow at cisco.com>]

Support also

/m


On 5/6/08 5:15 AM, "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <lufang at cisco.com> wrote:

> Support.
> Luyuan 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> George Swallow (swallow)
> Sent: 05 May 2008 18:09
> To: mpls at ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Poll for draft on EXP Bits to WG draft
> 
> This begins a one week poll to determine support for making
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-andersson-mpls-expbits-def-00.txt
> 
> a WG doc.
> 
> As background, early in the MPLS work, these bits were always intend for
> various uses as COS bits and other functions imbedded in the DS byte of
> the IP header.  They were called experimental only in that, at the time
> the encaps draft was written, there was no consensus on what to do with
> the bits.
> 
> The term experimental has lead various people and SDOs to expect more
> freedom in defining these bits than ever was intended.  This draft seeks
> to correct that.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls