Re: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work

["Shahram Davari" <davari at ieee.org>]

Hi Loa,

The term "extension" is not very appropriate. It doesn't cover the possible
case of MPLS TP requiring a reduction in MPLS functionality? 

How about changing that to "extensions and reductions"

Regards,
-Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa
Andersson
Sent: May-09-08 6:57 AM
To: ccamp; mpls at ietf.org; pwe3
Subject: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work

MPLS, CCAMP and PWE3 working groups,


The Joint Working Team of the IETF and ITU-T has resulted in
the agreement to create a Transport Profile for MPLS (MPLS TP).
This effort requires the MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP Working Groups
are chartered to do the required work.

The MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP chairs proposes that we add the
following paragraph to the three working group charters:

   "- Include extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] protocols and RFCs
      necessary to fulfill an MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS TP), the work
      on the MPLS TP needs to be coordinated between the three working
      groups (MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP) that are chartered to do MPLS TP
      work."

Please send your comments to the working group(s) mailing list(s)
eob Friday May 16.