Re: [mpls] [PWE3] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work

[Loa Andersson <loa at pi.nu>]

All,



Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Perhaps...
> OLD
> Include extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] protocols
> NEW
> Include modifications and extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] 
> protocols and procedures

my take on this that we are talking about "extensions" relative the
the existing specification, it is quite possible for an extension to
leave "components of the MPLS architecture unused", that is in
fact the case with most of our documents.

Consequently I agree with Stewart, and would oppose words like,
reduce and modify, since that implies that we intend to *change*
the MPLS architecture, while one of the foundations of the
agreement to create an MPLS TP was that it should fit into the
MPLS architecture.

/Loa
> 
> Adrian
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart Bryant" <stbryant at cisco.com>
> To: "Shahram Davari" <davari at ieee.org>
> Cc: "'ccamp'" <ccamp at ops.ietf.org>; <mpls at ietf.org>; "'pwe3'" 
> <pwe3 at ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work
> 
> 
>> I think it was fine as it was. We are not going to do and unnecessary
>> extensions, and we are not going to remove any functionality that is
>> already in there because we need it for other applications.
>>
>> We could perhaps say:
>>
>> "Include necessary extensions ...." to make it completely clear.
>>
>> Stewart
>>
>> Shahram Davari wrote:
>>> Hi Loa,
>>>
>>> Just a clarification. The term reduction means components of the MPLS
>>> architecture left unused.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Shahram
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Shahram Davari
>>> Sent: May-09-08 2:52 PM
>>> To: 'Loa Andersson'; 'ccamp'; mpls at ietf.org; 'pwe3'
>>> Subject: Re: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work
>>>
>>> Hi Loa,
>>>
>>> The term "extension" is not very appropriate. It doesn't cover the 
>>> possible
>>> case of MPLS TP requiring a reduction in MPLS functionality?
>>>
>>> How about changing that to "extensions and reductions"
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Shahram
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf 
>>> Of Loa
>>> Andersson
>>> Sent: May-09-08 6:57 AM
>>> To: ccamp; mpls at ietf.org; pwe3
>>> Subject: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work
>>>
>>> MPLS, CCAMP and PWE3 working groups,
>>>
>>>
>>> The Joint Working Team of the IETF and ITU-T has resulted in
>>> the agreement to create a Transport Profile for MPLS (MPLS TP).
>>> This effort requires the MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP Working Groups
>>> are chartered to do the required work.
>>>
>>> The MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP chairs proposes that we add the
>>> following paragraph to the three working group charters:
>>>
>>>    "- Include extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] protocols and RFCs
>>>       necessary to fulfill an MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS TP), the work
>>>       on the MPLS TP needs to be coordinated between the three working
>>>       groups (MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP) that are chartered to do MPLS TP
>>>       work."
>>>
>>> Please send your comments to the working group(s) mailing list(s)
>>> eob Friday May 16.
>>>
>>> Adrian, Deborah, Danny, Stewart, George and Loa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3 at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson at acreo.se
                                            loa at pi.nu
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls