 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I think I misunderstood
your question. What you are asking is whether you can bunch multiple label mappings
in to the same label mapping message. The answer is No. Each label mapping
message only maps one label to a set of FECs. Regarding the hop count
TLV, it could be used optionally. Regards, From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of priyanka
gupta thx Shahram. but still i am not clear on the
point that can i bunch number of FEC as well as same number of label associated
with the different FECs in the same label mapping?? Hop count
is required to prevent looping. ----- Original Message ---- Hi, Your understanding is correct. You can bunch a number of address
prefixes and assign them to the same label. But why do you think a hop count
TLV is needed? -Shahram From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On
Behalf Of priyanka gupta hello
all, Can
anybody help in understanding the statement in RFC 5036 "A
FEC is a list of one or more FEC elemets". For
example, If
there are three LDP enabled routers A--B--C. 50.50.50.1
,50.50.50.2, 50.50.50.3 , 50.50.50.4 are the four /32 host connetced to
the router C.. Router
C will advertise four label associated with four /32 host. So
in the label mapping message,can router C aggregrate all the four FEC
TLV and associated label with it or not? will
all four mentioned /32 host will be called FEC element of a FEC?? Can
i really club the label mapping messages and send in one label
mapping message??please help me to understand this. If we
really can do this then in that case label mapping message should have a
list of hop count TLV too,which is not specified in RFC. Meet people who discuss and share your passions. Join them now.
Meet
people who discuss and share your passions. Join
them now. |
_______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls