Re: [mpls] draft-asati-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-01.txt as wg document
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mpls] draft-asati-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-01.txt as wg document
Support also
On 5/27/08 10:26 AM, "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <lufang at cisco.com> wrote:
> Support.
> - Luyuan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Loa Andersson
> Sent: 19 May 2008 08:02
> To: mpls at ietf.org
> Cc: Ross Callon; David Ward
> Subject: [mpls] draft-asati-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-01.txt as wg document
>
> All,
>
> this two week poll resulted in no responses :( !
>
> This is surprising - since we had a good support for the document at the
> wg meeting.
>
> I don't if the lack of response is because I chose a bad subject-line,
> or because I've had quite a bit of problems with my email-address or
> because lack of interest.
>
> We are extending the poll until 2008-05-27 (May 27 2008).
>
> Loa and George
>
> Loa Andersson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> the authors of
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-asati-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-01.txt
>>
>> has requested that the document becomes a working group document.
>>
>> This is to start a two week poll on the mpls wg mailing list.
>>
>> Please send your comments to the mailing list; we are explicitly
>> soliciting both negative and positive comments.
>>
>>
>> Loa and George
>>
>
>
> --
> Loa Andersson
>
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson at acreo.se
> loa at pi.nu
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.