Re: [mpls] Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-02.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mpls] Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-02.txt



Hi,

Some last call comments. Mainly nits.

Cheers,
Adrian


Substance
---
The I-D should have an "Updates" clause in the header.
The text implies that multiple RFCs are updated. Which?
I guess: RFC 3032, RFC 3270, and RFC 5129, at least.
---
What about other RFCs that refer to the EXP bits?
Off the top of my head:
RFC 3985
RFC 3564
RFC 3469
RFC 4379
I'm sure there are others. grep should find them for you.
---
Section 2.1
Are you sure that you do not also want to update the figure shown in section 
2.1 of RFC 3032? In this figure, the field is called "Exp" and in the 
explanation we have "Exp:    Experimental Use, 3 bits". I would expect you 
to update that text as well.
---
Section 2.2
Section 1 of RFC 3270 also refers to the EXP field. Are you sure you don't 
want to update that text?
===
Editorial
---
Abstract para 3
OLD
   To avoid misunderstanding about how this field may be used this
   document re-introduces the name "CoS field" for this field.  In doing
   so it also updates documents that define the current usee of the EXP
   this field.
NEW
   To avoid misunderstanding about how this field may be used, this
   document changes the name of the field to the "CoS field".  In doing
   so it also updates documents that define the current use of the EXP
   this field.
===
Nits:
---
Abstract para 1
s/a the/the/
s/it is to be/it was to be/
---
Abstract para 2
s/. ././
---
Abstract para 3
s/may be used this/may be used, this/
s/usee/use/
---
Section 1 para 1
s/includes three bit field/includes a three bit field/
s/called "EXP field"/called the "EXP field"/
s/RFC 3032 leaves,, except/RFC 3032, except/
---
Section 1 para 2
s/information, the/information. The/
---
Section 1 para 6
s/3032/RFC 3032/
s/and it is not captured/and this fact is not captured/
---
Section 2.1 para 1
s/The RFC 3032/RFC 3032/
---
Section 2.2 Update to RFC 3270 section 1.2 para 5
s/The RFC 3270/RFC 3270/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Swallow" <swallow at cisco.com>
To: <mpls at ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:08 PM
Subject: [mpls] Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-02.txt


> This begins a two week last WG last call on the subject draft.  The draft 
> is
> available at
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-02.txt
>
> The last call closes June 25 0000 GMT.
>
> ...George
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.