[mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036

To: <mpls at ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036
From: "sameer kumar sarkar" <sameer_sarkar at rediffmail.com>
Date: 16 Jun 2008 08:26:47 -0000
Cc: sameer_sarkar at rediffmail.com
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: ietfarch-mpls-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=redf; d=rediffmail.com; b=hSsZrzzExwyfuK8ZaisxprQHGvj2GEmVG1QrgLNO96NKCz6ilfiAwM7k2fPEiY8f3LZsVYKPU/tr/pxwL0046hXgN8Y1dMjdvgO6icZe6ObjPxZGp0PIbbyB3yLAIsCXvzBcR8pCODc0GaKRViOLVyGNXcnuXlXwx2ta1sKqZn8= ;
List-archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces at ietf.org
Xx-cmae-analysis: score=0 v=1.0 c=1 a=LilwuTS0hsoA:10 a=Ss1ZqbW0gw5DoQm1B7AbYw==:17 a=J4-0f2Wf-MFpVYgdfl4A:9 a=17f2ckZk3LkOJmdhFoxIoM9aCXUA:4 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10 a=jHhWj_vsTdPuOy4LRKs8UmZSDpoA:4 a=YGxRMErdduYA:10

Hi All,
Can anyone please tell me, why RFC 5036 has obseleted 3036?
What was the problem in RFC 3036 which was fixed in RFC 5036?
How was this problem solved??

Thanks & Regards,
Sameer

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

Prev by Date: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036
Next by Date: Re: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036
Previous by thread: Re: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.