Re: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036

["Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi Sameer,

Check Section 7 or RFC5036, it details the differences you are looking for.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:53 PM, sameer kumar sarkar
<sameer_sarkar at rediffmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone please tell me, why RFC 5036 has obseleted 3036?
> What was the problem in RFC 3036 which was fixed in RFC 5036?
> How was this problem solved??
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Sameer
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietfFrom mpls-bounces at ietf.org  Mon Jun 16 04:54:10 2008
Return-Path: <mpls-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060D43A6A8E;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2228C3A6A8E
	for <mpls at core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id soL1DidFV6ky for <mpls at core3.amsl.com>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279FB3A690A
	for <mpls at ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so5698908wfd.31
	for <mpls at ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
	:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	bh=PIlhbzRjfpOEBiAEdZdzsy2CSeOr6ETYqiagXrHDmiQ=;
	b=WD6ut+MAYIOcJnfrtAFtU9ZdoNNqUwFQqGE7p939RjAcQ4lyGeyz5oPg04G/zp20rP
	BjUCeGW/SiHDr1b06iOp7EckcmpXVSVmDlCIiwoXZYuhKePp+9sXzZFZ7DRUk5BvXOc6
	AC+zE5mb2naS3V2Q6G5izM6b7ycu/OVE62doc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
	:references;
	b=H2lH+92EUTzi2cX51NMltDjfbJiZntodu94QmHeKWauP5/11/JnASG4h76DBcYFvGA
	hbM2XjcKat+QRtwhHzw8zMujX1EF27g0l/Ps8N1JTKLcRtGSAqC4obs/PyKhi+npJ8kT
	ZHigIcnlZ1mTPfG4htG0VWGYLXgpqW5w4gN54=
Received: by 10.142.52.9 with SMTP id z9mr2305923wfz.70.1213617286193;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.164.14 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0806160454k3640e74r8090d8eecc422aeb at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:54:46 +1000
From: "Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf at gmail.com>
To: "sameer kumar sarkar" <sameer_sarkar at rediffmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080615125351.14365.qmail at f4mail-235-131.rediffmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080615125351.14365.qmail at f4mail-235-131.rediffmail.com>
Cc: mpls at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Difference between RFC 3036 and 5036
X-BeenThere: mpls at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
	<mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
	<mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpls-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces at ietf.org

Hi Sameer,

Check Section 7 or RFC5036, it details the differences you are looking for.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:53 PM, sameer kumar sarkar
<sameer_sarkar at rediffmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone please tell me, why RFC 5036 has obseleted 3036?
> What was the problem in RFC 3036 which was fixed in RFC 5036?
> How was this problem solved??
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Sameer
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mai.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


lman/listinfo/mpls