Re: [mpls] [PWE3] FW: Changes to PW ACH Channel Type allocation policy

["BUSI ITALO" <Italo.Busi at alcatel-lucent.it>]

Stewart,

as far as I can understand from RFC 4446, a vendor can be prevented
implementing proprietary innovative features by simply disapproving its
codepoint request.

Italo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:11 AM
> To: BUSI ITALO
> Cc: Shahram Davari; BOCCI Matthew; pwe3 at ietf.org; 
> mpls-tp at ietf.org; mpls at ietf.org; ccamp at ietf.org; l2vpn at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] FW: Changes to PW ACH Channel Type 
> allocation policy
> 
> BUSI ITALO wrote:
> > I also support option 2
> >
> > The requirement is to allow a vendor to implement 
> proprietary innovative
> > features.
> >
> > Italo
> >
> >   
> Italo
> 
> How does option 1 prevent a vendor implementing proprietary 
> innovative 
> features?
> 
> Stewart
> 
______________From mpls-bounces at ietf.org  Fri Oct  3 00:55:56 2008
Return-Path: <mpls-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mpls-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B963A6AF4;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 00:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835A83A68EB;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 00:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id uspyXEEdZ0cP; Fri,  3 Oct 2008 00:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail6.alcatel.fr (gc-na5.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.5])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA193A686A;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 00:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com
	[155.132.6.75])
	by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id m937uHul024758; 
	Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:56:17 +0200
Received: from FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.55]) by
	FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft
	SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:56:17 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:56:27 +0200
Message-ID: <6FD21B53861BF44AA90A288402036AB40193FA17 at FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <48E47400.2090309 at cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [mpls] [PWE3] FW: Changes to PW ACH Channel Type
	allocation	policy
Thread-Index: AckkXh4Ga2Tii12ZSWONys7Db+iwcwAzh8TQ
References: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A029C6251 at FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>	<ba6305ea8b6f7b41bae8dcbb49c37c7c at mail.cph.tpack.net>
	<6FD21B53861BF44AA90A288402036AB40193F72F at FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
	<48E47400.2090309 at cisco.com>
From: "BUSI ITALO" <Italo.Busi at alcatel-lucent.it>
To: <stbryant at cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2008 07:56:17.0454 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[83F72CE0:01C9252D]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.84
Cc: l2vpn at ietf.org, BOCCI Matthew <Matthew.Bocci at alcatel-lucent.com>,
	mpls at ietf.org, ccamp at ietf.org, mpls-tp at ietf.org, pwe3 at ietf.org,
	Shahram Davari <davari at tpack.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] FW: Changes to PW ACH Channel Type
	allocation	policy
X-BeenThere: mpls at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
	<mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
	<mailto:mpls-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpls-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces at ietf.org

Stewart,

as far as I can understand from RFC 4446, a vendor can be prevented
implementing proprietary innovative features by simply disapproving its
codepoint request.

Italo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:11 AM
> To: BUSI ITALO
> Cc: Shahram Davari; BOCCI Matthew; pwe3 at ietf.org; 
> mpls-tp at ietf.org; mpls at ietf.org; ccamp at ietf.org; l2vpn at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] FW: Changes to PW ACH Channel Type 
> allocation policy
> 
> BUSI ITALO wrote:
> > I also support option 2
> >
> > The requirement is to allow a vendor to implement 
> proprietary innovative
> > features.
> >
> > Italo
> >
> >   
> Italo
> 
> How does option 1 prevent a vendor implementing proprietary 
> innovative 
> features?
> 
> Stewart
> 
_______________________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls