Re: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?

[Renwei Li <renweili at huawei.com>]

Opposed.

This draft imposes a new requirement on LER. But the new requirement has
nothing to do with inter-op. Moreover, the new requirement is really a
matter of local implementation, and doesn't look really like a "MUST"
requirement. 

Regards,

Renwei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 1:14 PM
> To: mpls at ietf.org
> Cc: Ross Callon; David Ward
> Subject: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> we have been asked to adopt draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt
> as a WG doc.
> 
> This is to start a two week poll. Please send your comments on
> whether you think this is ready to become a wg document.
> 
> George and Loa
> 
> --
> Loa Andersson
> 
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson at acreo.se
>                                            loa at pi.nu
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls