Re: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?

To: mpls at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?
From: Nathan Patrick <npatrick at corp.sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:46:07 -0800
Delivered-to: ietfarch-mpls-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: mpls at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/mpls>
List-help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

I support this draft wholeheartedly. Removing attack vectors is key to
the stability of the Internet, and this one is rather insidious.

I vote yes.

-Nathan
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

Prev by Date: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Poll for MPLS-TP documents to become mpls working groupdocuments
Next by Date: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Poll for MPLS-TP documents to become mpls working groupdocuments
Previous by thread: Re: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?
Next by thread: [mpls] A BNF specification for RSVP-TE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [mpls] draft-dasmith-mpls-ip-options-01.txt as a WG doc?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.