Re: [mpls] New version of draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-01

[Sami Boutros <sboutros at cisco.com>]

Hi Huub,


> If a message is malformed, how can it be determined that it
> was actually a loopback message?

In the inband option the ACH will have a well known code point,
the message will have to mean loopback.


> And would it also be possible that a message is malformed such
> that it looks like a loopback message?

Yes, this could happen. And this is why we check messages for
correctness of TLVs.

Thanks,

Sami

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls