Re: [mpls] New version of draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-01
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mpls] New version of draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-01



Hi Nitin,

Please have a look at the 02 version.

At 09:52 PM 3/22/2009, Nitin Bahadur wrote:
Hi Sami,

   I have a few meta questions on your draft.

1) Can you clarify if this loopback function is applicable just to MPLS-TP
or also to MPLS LSPs in general.

They are applicable for MPLS LSP's in general.

2) You mention that a MPLS-TP LSP can be set into FLB or OLB mode. I presume
the *unlock OAM packets* will not be looped back. Can you please clarify
that ?

Sure.

3) I am not clear on the motivation for OAM loopback mode. Can you clarify
why we need a OAM loopback mode ?

in draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-01.txt need of loopback function is
mentioned for connection verification and for 2 ways delay measurements.


4) Section 4.5 - Auth TLV. If the message is sent in-band, do we need a
auth-tlv ? Was there any requirement (in some requirement draft) to have
auth for loopback mode?

Good point will ask to add this requirement to the requirement doc for OAM
intrusive functions.

5) Section 4.9 - Data packets. The optional seq-id solution seems a little
half-baked. At the least, the id should be a 64-bit field.

Will look into that.

6) Section 4.10 - NMS. This section seems to specify requirements and no
real solution. I'm not sure why this section is part of your draft. Your
draft does not seem to add anything new to enable a NMS to do something.

This is a TBD section need more work.

7) Finally, you have defined a new encap mechanism for TLVs. Any particular
reason that the lsp-ping packet cannot be enclosed after the ACH header? Can
we just re-use the lsp-ping packet formats....they seem to have a whole
bunch of things that you are re-defining.

We made the message format in 02 very similar to the LSP ping Message format.

Thanks,

Sami

Thanks
Nitin

> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Sami Boutros" <sboutros at cisco.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:09 AM
> To: "Loa Andersson" <loa at pi.nu>; <mpls at ietf.org>
> Cc: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" <msiva at cisco.com>; "David Ward"
> <dward at cisco.com>
> Subject: [mpls] New version of draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-01
>
>> Please find the updated version of the draft @
>>
>> http://www.tla-group.com/~loa/draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-01.txt
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sami
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.