Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4379 (1786)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4379 (1786)



Please accept this.

(Thanks Jon!)

...George


On 5/20/09 3:02 AM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4379,
> "Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4379&eid=1786
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Jon Chung Hyok <jonch at hanasoft.com.cn>
> 
> Section: 4.4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> on page 38
>          If the number of labels in the FEC stack is greater
>             than or equal to FEC-stack-depth {
> 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>          If the number of FECs in the FEC stack is greater
>             than or equal to FEC-stack-depth {
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> labels -> FECs
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4379 (draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data
> Plane Failures
> Publication Date    : February 2006
> Author(s)           : K. Kompella, G. Swallow
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.