Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft

To: Loa Andersson <loa at pi.nu>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:58:58 +0100
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=stbryant at cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: mpls at ietf.org, pwe3 at ietf.org, mpls-tp at ietf.org
Delivered-to: mpls at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=459; t=1243861138; x=1244725138; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant at cisco.com; z=From:=20Stewart=20Bryant=20<stbryant at cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpls]=20poll=20on=20the=20Rosetta=20St one=20draft |Sender:=20; bh=5AM9CqO4XplyfDWzYlap7TXW05M6ivvyj5NlXg4YFYw=; b=jynGk05mUhuMpMAX1jlFSf+Vi+UDxQ3+9QZ6u0M2Sgx8LAlcjNrY4TuAg6 FyFX2zOduq9Y2kWy1/8sQ/NvV/sWlI7pEmc99htjjPM7eMAdp0JXGnIHzxwP LZr6QcnODH;
In-reply-to: <4A1BB784.7030501 at pi.nu>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A1BB784.7030501 at pi.nu>
Reply-to: stbryant at cisco.com
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)

this is to start a two week poll on the suggestion to make the
draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-00 an MPLS working group
document.

Normally we would require a draft to be in a cleaner
state before accepting it as a WG draft. None-the-less
I support this being a WG draft.

One question - I assume that it will not be published
as an RFC for a while so that we can continue to
add new terms to it as the project progresses.

Stewart

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
  - From: Loa Andersson

References:
- [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
  - From: Loa Andersson

Prev by Date: [mpls] new working group draft
Next by Date: Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
Previous by thread: Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
Next by thread: Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [mpls] poll on the Rosetta Stone draft

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.