Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] poll on making the mpls-tp process document a working group draft - update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] poll on making the mpls-tp process document a working group draft - update
I support
BR
Annamaria
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-tp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: lunedì 6 luglio 2009 12.41
To: mpls at ietf.org; mpls-tp at ietf.org; pwe3 at ietf.org; ccamp at ietf.org
Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on making the mpls-tp process document a working group draft - update
All,
I started this poll, but since I'm one of the authors of the document I do not feel comfortable to judge the consensus on the poll.
I have therefore asked our AD (Adrian Farrel) to step in and together with George make the consensus call.
/Loa
Loa Andersson wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > we have an individual draft, draft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txt,
> > that describes additions to the mpls working group process to allow > > ITU-T to give input on MPLS-TP Internet Drafts.
> >
> > It pretty much captures current practice, and from the start we had no > > intention to ever progress, but recently there has been comments that > > it would have a better and clearer sttus if it were a working group > > document.
> >
> > We have had no plans to ever make it an RFC, but it has been pointed > > out that it would be possible to publish as an Historical RFC. Whether > > we execute on that or not is not yet decided.
> >
> > Therefore, is is to start at two week poll on making > > draft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txt an MPLS working group document.
> >
> > The poll ends on July 14.
> >
> > Please send your comments to the mpls-tp list.
--
Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson at ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa at pi.nu
Ericsson Inc phone: +46 8 632 77 14
_______________________________________________
mpls-tp mailing list
mpls-tp at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.