Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3270 (1910)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3270 (1910)



Hi,

Note that, per RFC5462, the EXP bits are renamed to the TC (Traffic Class) field. Not the "COS field".

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shahram Davari" <davari at broadcom.com> To: "Francois Le Faucheur" <flefauch at cisco.com>; "fanshaojun" <fanshaojun at huawei.com> Cc: <mpls at ietf.org>; <jh at song.fi>; "Bruce Davie" <bsd at cisco.com>; <liwwu at cisco.com>; <ram at axiowave.com>; <pierrick.cheval at space.alcatel.fr>; "springfield colors" <springfieldcolors at gmail.com>; <davari at ieee.org>; <pasi.vaananen at nokia.com>; "Adrian Farrel" <Adrian.Farrel at huawei.com>; "Ross Callon" <rcallon at juniper.net>; "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3270 (1910)


Hi Francois and co-authors,

I think you are correct. So I have no objection in changing that in the Errata.

Regards,
Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francois Le Faucheur
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:37 AM
To: fanshaojun
Cc: mpls at ietf.org; Le Faucheur Francois; jh at song.fi; Bruce Davie; liwwu at cisco.com; ram at axiowave.com; pierrick.cheval at space.alcatel.fr; springfield colors; Ross Callon; pasi.vaananen at nokia.com; Adrian Farrel; davari at ieee.org; RFC Errata System
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3270 (1910)

Hello,

Just looked back at RFC3270:
MAPnb defines the number of MAP entries carried inside the DIFFSERV
object.
Each MAP entry defines the mapping between one EXP (now "COS") field
value and one PHB.
Since there is only 8 possible EXP values, I think:
* MAPnb should actually be encoded over 3 bits, and not 4 bits
* value range should be 0-7.
Does that sound right?

If yes, I can update the errata with appropraite required changes.

Francois

On 14 Oct 2009, at 03:34, fanshaojun wrote:

Dear ALL:

This MAPnb column occupied 4 bits in the object. So it can be set to
any
value from 0 to 15.

Corrected Text will be
--------------
MAPnb : 4 bits
        Indicates the number of MAP entries included in the DIFFSERV
        Object.  This can be set to any value from 0 to 15.


-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:31 PM
To: flefauch at cisco.com; liwwu at cisco.com; bsd at cisco.com; davari at ieee.org
;
pasi.vaananen at nokia.com; ram at axiowave.com; pierrick.cheval at space.alcatel.fr
;
jh at song.fi; rcallon at juniper.net; adrian.farrel at huawei.com;
swallow at cisco.com; loa at pi.nu
Cc: mpls at ietf.org; flefauch at cisco.com; rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3270 (1910)


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3270,
"Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated
Services".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3270&eid=1910

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch at cisco.com>

Section: 5.2.1

Original Text
-------------
MAPnb : 4 bits
        Indicates the number of MAP entries included in the DIFFSERV
        Object.  This can be set to any value from 0 to 8.

Corrected Text
--------------
MAPnb : 4 bits
        Indicates the number of MAP entries included in the DIFFSERV
        Object.  This can be set to any value from 0 to 7.

Notes
-----
This errata was reported by Colors Springfield <springfieldcolors at gmail.com
>
on 13 October 2009.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC3270 (draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of
Differentiated Services
Publication Date    : May 2002
Author(s)           : F. Le Faucheur, L. Wu, B. Davie, S. Davari, P.
Vaananen, R. Krishnan, P. Cheval, J. Heinanen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.