[mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5586 (1940)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5586 (1940)
- To: matthew.bocci at alcatel-lucent.com, martin.vigoureux at alcatel-lucent.com, stbryant at cisco.com, rcallon at juniper.net, adrian.farrel at huawei.com, swallow at cisco.com, loa at pi.nu
- Subject: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5586 (1940)
- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:11:21 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org, mpls at ietf.org
- Delivered-to: mpls at core3.amsl.com
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
- List-help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5586,
"MPLS Generic Associated Channel".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5586&eid=1940
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci at alcatel-lucent.com>
Section: 10
Original Text
-------------
In order to support this
requirement, IANA has changed the code point allocation scheme for
the PW Associated Channel Type be changed as follows:
0 - 32751 : IETF Review
32760 - 32767 : Experimental
Corrected Text
--------------
In order to support this
requirement, IANA has changed the code point allocation scheme for
the PW Associated Channel Type be changed as follows:
0 - 32759 : IETF Review
32760 - 32767 : Experimental
32768 - 65535 : IETF Review
Notes
-----
There are some gaps in the specified allocation policy for some parts of the ACH channel type range (32752 to 32759 and 32768 to 65535). The channel type is a 16-bit value, and the IANA considerations section of RFC5586 should be updated to reflect this.
I propose that the correction should be to clarify that the allocation policy for the code points that have been left out of RFC5586 is IETF review (which I believe reflects the WG consensus at the time of publication), and to leave the Experimental range where it is to avoid impacting current implementations.
This also requires an update by IANA to the PW ACH Channel Type registry.
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC5586 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-gach-gal-06)
--------------------------------------
Title : MPLS Generic Associated Channel
Publication Date : June 2009
Author(s) : M. Bocci, Ed., M. Vigoureux, Ed., S. Bryant, Ed.
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.