RE: [Nea] meet to review BOF at IETF?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Nea] meet to review BOF at IETF?



ACK on both 11:30 and 4:10 today.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Vollbrecht [mailto:jrv at mtghouse.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:53 AM
To: Steve Hanna
Cc: John Vollbrecht; NEA
Subject: Re: [Nea] meet to review BOF at IETF?

4:10 at the message board is fine.  I am also free for lunch, and  
would like to meet with anyone that can't meet there at 4:10.  can  
meet at message board at 11:30 if you want to have lunch.

-- John


On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Steve Hanna wrote:

> Good idea, John. I'm sure we've all been having
> interesting conversations and thoughts since
> the BOF. Unfortunately, Susan and I are busy
> for lunch (WG Chairs Lunch). How about the
> afternoon break today? I propose we meet at
> 4:10 PM at the IETF message board. OK?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Vollbrecht [mailto:jrv at mtghouse.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:03 AM
>> To: NEA
>> Subject: [Nea] meet to review BOF at IETF?
>>
>> I am wondering if people would like to get together to review
>> the BOF
>> and any feedback we might have gotten while we are face to face at
>> IETF.  I have gotten some comments that I think are interesting and
>> might help moving forward, and I can note them in an email when I
>> have a few minutes, but I am wondering if people will be around - I
>> will be here till Thursday afternoon - and would like to touch base
>> for a few minutes.
>>
>> - John
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nea mailing list
>> Nea at ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.