Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

To: Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
Subject: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:44:41 -0400
Cc: nea at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20061024182917.9B86516CE0@mail.nitros9.org>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nea>
List-help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061024182917.9B86516CE0@mail.nitros9.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909)

  I don't see how NEA is such a big philosophical change from existing
RADIUS practices.

perhaps not, but I don't see how past mistakes are a justification for future ones.

Keith


_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea

References:
- Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  - From: Alan DeKok

Prev by Date: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Next by Date: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Previous by thread: RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Next by thread: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.