Re: [Nea] use of a design team to develop requirements
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nea] use of a design team to develop requirements



I agree with this as well, and I am sure other "design team" members
also agree. Infact, we have already had lots of discussions on the
mailing lists on the requirements and that's driving a lot of what we
are putting in the draft. Also I don't believe the intent of a small
design team was to exclude mailing lists discussions & participation.

I look towards the chairs for advice on the specifics of this
process...my personal thoughts would be sharing weekly design team
meeting summary, send out an early rev of the draft for feedback, etc.

my belief is that the "design team" should not be drafting any requirements text in advance of list discussion. instead, they should try to write up goals and requirements based on the discussion on the list, with an eye to what kind of language might reach consensus.


something else they might try to do is to come up with topics for discussion - e.g. name some categories for requirements that should be discussed, or mention tradeoffs and ask the list what's an appropriate compromise for each.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.