Re: Fwd: [Nea] Re: use of a design team to develop requirements

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

> >   I would like to see the requirements stated as a series of stages,
> > from "anyone is allowed on the network with no checks", to "you must
> > submit to invasive probes", with a graduated range of assessments in
> > between.
> 
> Alan, this needs to be generalized to something like "products must
> have configurable actions based on posture assessment" but this is a
> policy or action statement that will be defined by oranganizations and
> is beyond the scope of the working group.

I don't know that I agree with the "series of stages" argument, but the
topic is certainly  NOT beyond the scope of the WG - because NEA has
privacy implications for hosts and such implications could affect the
ability of NEA to meet IETF criteria for Proposed Standard status. 
 
Keith

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea