Re: Fwd: [Nea] Re: use of a design team to develop requirements

["Mike Fratto" <mfratto at gmail.com>]

On 12/13/06, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
> Mike Fratto wrote:
>
> > Ok, I am not going to act as charter police, but what you are
> > describing is a matter local policy and a matter of deployed
> > infrastructure regarding both assessment and enforcement.
>
>   If all requirements are a matter of local policy, then this WG will
> never develop a standard.

Nah, local policies are the "WHY". Protocols are the "HOW." It is the
how that matters, IMHO, to working groups.

>   How does the TNC overlap with NEA?  The chair of NEA is also the chair
> of TNC, but I haven't seen any statement about that topic.

To see how the the *functions* of PA, PB, and PT, as defined in the
charter are also defined by these other frameworks are related to the
work proposed by the NEA, read:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/nap/default.mspx
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns466/networking_solutions_package.html
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/groups/network/

If you can't see how the functional aspects of PA, PB, and PT are
related to TNC, CNAC and NAP, let me know and I will lay it out for
you.

>   Interoperation of... what, exactly?  Again, discussion of the
> requirements and architecture is on topic for this list.  You're
> skipping over that entirely, and assuming certain technologies.

No, I am not. Stop being argumentative.

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea