Re: Fwd: [Nea] Re: use of a design team to develop requirements

[Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>]

Mike Fratto wrote:
> To see how the the *functions* of PA, PB, and PT, as defined in the
> charter are also defined by these other frameworks are related to the
> work proposed by the NEA, read:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/nap/default.mspx
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns466/networking_solutions_package.html
> https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/groups/network/

  As I said, you're assuming certain problems, requirements, and
architectures.

> If you can't see how the functional aspects of PA, PB, and PT are
> related to TNC, CNAC and NAP, let me know and I will lay it out for
> you.

  I can see it. I just can't see how you can say you're not assuming
certain technologies, and then in the same message, refer to
pre-existing technologies as normitive references for NEA terminology
and operation.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea