Re: NEA requirements (was Re: Fwd: [Nea] Re: use of a design team to develop requirements)

[Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>]

On Dec 22, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:

> Douglas Otis wrote:
> > A mutually trusted service is not ridiculous.
>
>   Did you read the text you're allegedly responding to?

Review the open issues for discussion indicated in the charter.  If  
you have an I-D you would like reviewed, please provide a reference.   
Sharing elaborate system details with every NEA server is not a good  
strategy for security or compatibility.  It is difficult to imagine  
that asking the end-point what they claim to have accomplished offers  
any type of solution whatsoever.  Such a solution will be immediately  
defeated.

-Doug 

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea