Re: [Nea] REQ: Section 3

["Fergie" <fergdawg at netzero.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:

>The comments in Section 3.1 about lying endpoints should reference
>section 8.1.1, and state that the issue is dealt with in more detail
>there.  Without additional explanation, the current text seems to be
>saying "we'll secure the system by asking it questions... but it can
>lie.  Oh well."  Adding a reference to the security section indicates
>that there may be mitigating circumstances.
>

[many good comments elided]

Yes, I agree -- I was going to point out a couple of these myself,
as several things appear to be contradictory to one another...

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075)

wj8DBQFFpc45q1pz9mNUZTMRApvMAJ9I6Lb0DbQiQoAlu8NA56B1fpwZtwCg9s6A
SJQqK458jGZs+XF0GHxSfX0=
=K9yx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea