Re: [Nea] Judging consensus on NEA protocol proposals

[Wei Jiwei <jiwei.wei at huawei.com>]

Agree.


-----Original Message-----
From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan
Thomson (sethomso)
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 1:35 AM
To: nea at ietf.org
Subject: [Nea] Judging consensus on NEA protocol proposals

In a previous email to the NEA WG mailing list prior to the IETF, we
requested feedback regarding adopting the following Internet Drafts as WG
drafts for PA, PB, PA Security respectively. The drafts are:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea/draft-sangster-nea-pa-tnc-00.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea/draft-sahita-nea-pb-tnc-00.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea/draft-sangster-nea-pa-tnc-security-00.txt


At IETF 71, we reviewed these proposals and the following consensus question
was raised for each draft: "Do you support adopting the draft as a WG
draft?"
1. Yes
2. No
3. Defer

1) means that the draft is regarded as a good foundation for a WG -00 draft.
It does NOT mean adopting the draft "AS IS". The draft will be treated as
any I-D -00 version where updates are made based on WG consensus.
2) means that the draft would not form a good basis for a WG draft.
3) means to defer a decision based on some further action taking place.

The clear consensus at the meeting at IETF 71 was to support adopting PA-TNC
and PB-TNC as WG drafts, and to defer the decision on the adoption of PA-TNC
Security until more work has been done on the PA and PB protocols so that
the security implications are better understood.

We need to confirm this consensus on the NEA WG email list. Please respond
to this email and indicate if you agree or disagree with the decisions
above. Even if you participated in the discussion and consensus check at
IETF 71, it is important for you to participate in this email consensus
check. A simple "Agree" email will suffice, but if you disagree with a
decision on any one of the drafts, or want to say more, a longer email is
certainly OK also. If there is no consensus, we will need to discuss the
matter by email until we can reach rough consensus.

This consensus check will close after one week (at 5 PM EDT on Friday, March
28).

Thanks
Susan and Steve
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea


_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea