[Nea] FW: Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nea] FW: Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
The WGLC on -07 version of the NEA rFrom nea-bounces at ietf.org Wed May 21 08:06:50 2008
Return-Path: <nea-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nea-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nea-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7A13A6A71;
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: nea at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32FA3A6A71
for <nea at core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id P5HaqbXlZ+ln for <nea at core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F153A6A6E
for <nea at ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,520,1204520400";
d="scan'208";a="8880186"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158])
by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2008 11:06:50 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12])
by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4LF6ous024224;
Wed, 21 May 2008 11:06:50 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com
[64.102.31.12])
by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LF6oWf002298;
Wed, 21 May 2008 15:06:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by
xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 21 May 2008 11:06:44 -0400
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:06:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E699396B05B527429E4D9B8533679C4904EFEC4E at xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Nea] Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA):
Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: Aci7UFagqOLpCSNAT12aLOHRvAJQ+gAAqLmQ
From: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso at cisco.com>
To: <nea at ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2008 15:06:44.0202 (UTC)
FILETIME=[4823ECA0:01C8BB54]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2707; t=1211382410;
x=1212246410; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=sethomso at cisco.com;
z=From:=20=22Susan=20Thomson=20(sethomso)=22=20<sethomso at cis
co.com>
|Subject:=20FW=3A=20[Nea]=20Document=20Action=3A=20'Network
=20Endpoint=20Assessment=20(NEA)=3A=20Overview=20and=20Requi
rements'=20to=20Informational=20RFC |Sender:=20
|To:=20<nea at ietf.org>;
bh=RwkLurgs/9TCUaOrhyMY7cPJKltiUUuUhyG1dWCutvI=;
b=AwWc/CQia3p5ZScbE7nTGiMuQACkx8ucUgAHXL8IvMtv9zcTjVfgBh0Fqb
c60XMv9r4Ewxl4dCrpEGmLl5yOBD0SV3Cha54AUyIk4e4bngEtMLpxovcr6B
+MBc/jH5+L;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=sethomso at cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Subject: [Nea] FW: Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA):
Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: nea at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>,
<mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>,
<mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nea-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: nea-bounces at ietf.org
The WGLC on -07 version of the NEA requiremeequirements draft ended last week
without negative comment. Based on discussions at the last IETF and the
result of the Last Call, it was the judgement of the WG chairs that we
have consensus on the changes to the document.
The document was recently re-submitted to our AD, Tim Polk, to review
the changes in the IESG with the intent to publish as Info RFC. As you
can see, the approval announcement has recently been posted.
Thank you to the editors and all WG participants for their efforts on
this document.
Susan and Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:38 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: Internet Architecture Board; nea mailing list; nea chair; RFC Editor
Subject: [Nea] Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA):
Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements '
<draft-ietf-nea-requirements-07.txt> as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Network Endpoint Assessment Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-requirements-07.txt
Technical Summary
This document defines the problem statement, scope and
protocol requirements between the components of the NEA
(Network Endpoint Assessment) reference model. NEA provides
owners of networks (e.g. an enterprise offering remote access)
a mechanism to evaluate the posture of a system. This may
take place during the request for network access and/or
subsequently at any time while connected to the network.
The learned posture information can then be applied to a
variety of compliance oriented decisions. The posture
information is frequently useful for detecting systems
that are lacking or have out of date security protective
mechanisms such as: anti-virus and host-based firewall
software.
Working Group Summary
This document is a product of the Network Endpoint Assessement
(nea) Working Group. There is strong consensus in the WG to
publish this document.
Protocol Quality
Tim Polk reviewed this specification for the IESG. There is at least
one group of WG participants drafting protocol specifications to
meet the requirements in this document.
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
nts draft ended last week
without negative comment. Based on discussions at the last IETF and the
result of the Last Call, it was the judgement of the WG chairs that we
have consensus on the changes to the document.
The document was recently re-submitted to our AD, Tim Polk, to review
the changes in the IESG with the intent to publish as Info RFC. As you
can see, the approval announcement has recently been posted.
Thank you to the editors and all WG participants for their efforts on
this document.
Susan and Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:38 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: Internet Architecture Board; nea mailing list; nea chair; RFC Editor
Subject: [Nea] Document Action: 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA):
Overview and Requirements' to Informational RFC
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements '
<draft-ietf-nea-requirements-07.txt> as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Network Endpoint Assessment Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-requirements-07.txt
Technical Summary
This document defines the problem statement, scope and
protocol requirements between the components of the NEA
(Network Endpoint Assessment) reference model. NEA provides
owners of networks (e.g. an enterprise offering remote access)
a mechanism to evaluate the posture of a system. This may
take place during the request for network access and/or
subsequently at any time while connected to the network.
The learned posture information can then be applied to a
variety of compliance oriented decisions. The posture
information is frequently useful for detecting systems
that are lacking or have out of date security protective
mechanisms such as: anti-virus and host-based firewall
software.
Working Group Summary
This document is a product of the Network Endpoint Assessement
(nea) Working Group. There is strong consensus in the WG to
publish this document.
Protocol Quality
Tim Polk reviewed this specification for the IESG. There is at least
one group of WG participants drafting protocol specifications to
meet the requirements in this document.
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
