[Nea] Brief NEA WG F2F Summary
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nea] Brief NEA WG F2F Summary
Here's a brief summary of yesterday's NEA WG meeting,
for those who could not attend. Detailed minutes will
be coming soon and then we will confirm consensus on
the email list for all matters where there seemed to
be consensus in the room.
Thanks,
Steve
---------
Brief Summary of 2008-11-19 NEA WG Meeting
The nea WG met for 2 hours on Wednesday afternoon, 2008-11-19.
We reviewed the changes made in the -02 versions of PA-TNC and
PB-TNC. Then we moved on to a discussion of the last open issues
left on these specs. We reviewed a list of posture attributes
found in a recent survey of NAC products. Most are covered by
the attributes already in PA-TNC. Others will be considered
on the mailing list. A problem with the PB-TNC state machine
was pointed out and a solution presented. Assertion attributes
have not been specified yet. Since the PA-TNC and PB-TNC specs
are otherwise almost ready for WGLC, assertion attributes may
be moved to a separate draft. We talked about IANA Considerations
for our current drafts. There was consensus in the room to move
to Specification Required with Expert Review. FinallFrom nea-bounces at ietf.org Thu Nov 20 04:41:38 2008
Return-Path: <nea-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nea-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nea-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9197E3A688A;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: nea at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC5B3A688A
for <nea at core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id zaMoRZwP6BoM for <nea at core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og115.obsmtp.com (exprod7ob115.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.216])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADB63A6768
for <nea at ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by exprod7ob115.postini.com
([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP
ID DSNKSSVa+SsxSMwcI/2z7O1+80SWCQtW+Yw/@postini.com;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:41:35 PST
Received: from p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.47]) by p-emsmtp01.jnpr.net
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:40:53 -0800
Received: from pi-smtp.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.36]) by p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:40:53 -0800
Received: from proton.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.37]) by pi-smtp.jnpr.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:40:52 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:40:46 -0500
Message-ID: <A6398B0DB62A474C82F61554EE937287069F03DF at proton.jnpr.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Brief NEA WG F2F Summary
Thread-Index: AclKqvucZ5NE3eo2R62/61kCA+KGBgAH8kowABB8ZqA=
From: "Stephen Hanna" <shanna at juniper.net>
To: <nea at ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2008 12:40:52.0762 (UTC)
FILETIME=[397867A0:01C94B0D]
Subject: [Nea] Brief NEA WG F2F Summary
X-BeenThere: nea at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>,
<mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>,
<mailto:nea-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nea-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: nea-bounces at ietf.org
Here's a brief summary of yesterday's NEA WG meeting,
for those who could not attend. Detailed minutes will
be coming soon and then we will confirm consensus on
the email list for all matters where there seemed to
be consensus in the room.
Thanks,
Steve
---------
Brief Summary of 2008-11-19 NEA WG Meeting
The nea WG met for 2 hours on Wednesday afternoon, 2008-11-19.
We reviewed the changes made in the -02 versions of PA-TNC and
PB-TNC. Then we moved on to a discussion of the last open issues
left on these specs. We reviewed a list of posture attributes
found in a recent survey of NAC products. Most are covered by
the attributes already in PA-TNC. Others will be considered
on the mailing list. A problem with the PB-TNC state machine
was pointed out and a solution presented. Assertion attributes
have not been specified yet. Since the PA-TNC and PB-TNC specs
are otherwise almost ready for WGLC, assertion attributes may
be moved to a separate draft. We talked about IANA Considerations
for our current drafts. There was consensus in the room to move
to Specification Required with Expert Review. Finally, we loy, we looked
at moving our milestones back by four months to reflect the
current status of our documents. We hope to send the docs
for WGLC in January 2009 and IETF LC in April 2009. We may
then turn our attention to Assertion Attributes and PT,
the NEA transport protocol.
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
oked
at moving our milestones back by four months to reflect the
current status of our documents. We hope to send the docs
for WGLC in January 2009 and IETF LC in April 2009. We may
then turn our attention to Assertion Attributes and PT,
the NEA transport protocol.
_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.