Re: [Nea] Eval Against NEA Requirements

["Joseph Tardo" <jjt at pacbell.net>]

I would be OK with moving it to an annex, preferably before the use cases.

 

--Joe

----- Original Message -----

From: Paul Sangster

To: NEA

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:18 PM

Subject: [Nea] Eval Against NEA Requirements

The editors have been working on the WG discussed updates to the next revision of PA-TNC and PB-TNC specs.  One question that was raised was whether the Evaluation Against NEA Requirements sections of the I-Ds is still required.  These section were included in the original personal submission I-Ds as part of the author's asserting that the PA-TNC and PB-TNC protocols met the requirements of RFC 5209.  These sections seem to have some value for historical purposes and to show the NEA WG considered RFC 5209 during the selection process, but do we still need this text in our eventual RFCs for the protocols?

 

The question we would like the WG to answer is:

 

What should we do with the Evaluation Against NEA Requirements text (section 5) in PA-TNC and PB-TNC?

 

1) Remove it

2) Leave it as is

3) Move it to an appendix

 

Please respond to this question by 5PM PST on Jan 23rd so the editors can make the desired change. 

 

Thanks,

 

The PA and PB Editors

 

 

---

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
Nea at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea