Re: [Nea] Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec

[Stephen Hanna <shanna at juniper.net>]

Thanks for catching these problems, Susan. You're right on
both counts. Since these are errors in the current spec,
I don't think it's necessary to complete a lengthy check
of WG consensus before fixing them. However, if anyone
has concerns or comments on these issues, please raise
them now.

Thanks,

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Susan Thomson (sethomso)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:57 PM
> To: nea at ietf.org
> Subject: [Nea] Remaining comments on NEA PB-TNC spec
> 
> I noticed a couple of nits when last reviewing
> draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt:
> 
> 1. Retry-Acknowledge flag : The current text is a legacy of 
> the original
> state machine, and needs to be changed. I believe that this
> functionality is no longer needed with the current state machine, and
> can be removed. 
> 
> 2.  There is a typo in Section 4.1 where the Version header 
> field should
> be 2 for Version Not Supported errors. Version error handling is
> correctly specified in Section 4.9.2.
> 
> It would be good if these could be addressed in the next 
> version of the
> spec.
> 
> Thanks
> Susan
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>