Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on changes to PB-TNC I-D since WGLC

[Stephen Hanna <shanna at juniper.net>]

I also support the changes.

Thanks to the IESG for providing careful review and valuable
feedback from all perspectives on these specifications. The
resulting specifications are much better as a result of this
review and the resulting changes.

Thanks,

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Paul Sangster
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 6:33 PM
> To: Susan Thomson (sethomso); nea at ietf.org
> Cc: tim.polk at nist.gov
> Subject: Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on changes to PB-TNC 
> I-D since WGLC
> 
> I support the changes. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Susan Thomson (sethomso)
> > Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 2:38 PM
> > To: nea at ietf.org
> > Cc: tim.polk at nist.gov
> > Subject: [Nea] Verifying consensus on changes to PB-TNC I-D 
> since WGLC
> > 
> > The IESG has completed its evaluation of the PA-TNC and 
> > PB-TNC drafts, and is ready to approve publication.  However, 
> > the PB-TNC draft includes significant changes to the pb-tnc 
> > state machine, as well as additional PT requirements, and the 
> > AD and WG chairs would like to confirm that working group has 
> > reviewed these changes and is comfortable with the result.
> > 
> > Specifically, the CLOSE batch type was introduced and error 
> > handling was tightened up to address issues raised by members 
> > of the IESG. These changes are incorporated in the -06 draft 
> > of pb-tnc, and appear throughout section 4 (including its 
> > subsections). The additional PT requirements are listed in a 
> > new section in Section 3.3.1.
> > 
> > Please review these changes and respond by Mon, Nov 16, 5pm PT.
> > Indicate in your response whether you support the changes. If 
> > you do, a short response indicating this is all that is 
> > necessary. If you do not, please explain your concern and how 
> > the issue can be resolved.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Susan & Steve
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nea mailing list
> > Nea at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>