Re: [Netconf] Netconf Notification: One last bit of Discuss: Session Accumulation

[Andy Bierman <andy at netconfcentral.com>]

Sharon Chisholm wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Why I don't disagree, this change can be made with an RFC editor's note,
> so I don't see the harm.
> 

IMO, standards should be precise, and normative text
should be as small as possible.  Tell me how to
implement the specification in an inter-operable manner,
and nothing else.  (Obviously a minority opinion in the IETF.)

The text is ambiguous.
Does it mean N sessions?
N <create-subscription> requests on 1 session?

Is this normative text in the attachment?


> Sharon 


Andy

_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf