Re: [Netconf] Netconf Notification: One last bit of Discuss: Session Accumulation

["Sharon Chisholm" <schishol at nortel.com>]

Hi

It is going in the security considerations section. The text is more
instructions to the operator then the implementer. Do you have any
suggested improvements?

Sharon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Bierman [mailto:andy at netconfcentral.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:44 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
Cc: netconf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Netconf Notification: One last bit of Discuss:
Session Accumulation

Sharon Chisholm wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Why I don't disagree, this change can be made with an RFC editor's 
> note, so I don't see the harm.
> 

IMO, standards should be precise, and normative text should be as small
as possible.  Tell me how to implement the specification in an
inter-operable manner, and nothing else.  (Obviously a minority opinion
in the IETF.)

The text is ambiguous.
Does it mean N sessions?
N <create-subscription> requests on 1 session?

Is this normative text in the attachment?


> Sharon


Andy

_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf