Re: [Netconf] Netconf Notification: One last bit ofDiscuss: Session Accumulation

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington at comcast.net>]

I like this proposed text much better.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:netconf-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:10 AM
> To: Sharon Chisholm
> Cc: netconf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Netconf Notification: One last bit 
> ofDiscuss: Session Accumulation
> 
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:52:51AM -0400, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>  
> > If a malicious or buggy NETCONF client sends a number of
> > <create-subscription> requests  without ever terminating 
> any of them,
> > they will accumulate subscriptions and begin to use up 
> system resources.
> > They do so while accumulating NETCONF sessions and when the 
> underlying
> > NETCONF session is terminated, so is the Notification 
> subscription. The
> > <kill-session> operation should be used to terminate any 
> suspect NETCONF
> > sessions.
> 
> I do not understand the second sentence. And who is "they" in the
> first sentence? What about this wording:
> 
>   If a malicious or buggy NETCONF client sends a number of
>   <create-subscription> requests, then these subscriptions
accumulate
>   and may use up system resources. In such a situation,
subscriptions
>   can be terminated by terminating the suspect underlying NETCONF
>   sessions using the <kill-session> operation.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 

_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf