Re: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft

["Sharon Chisholm" <schishol at nortel.com>]

Hi

For some internal stuff I need clarification on the first point. As
such, I propose that the given list of statistics be clarified to just
be for NETCONF. This would not preclude adding additional statistics in
the future that go beyond this (current number of sessions for example
might include CLI sessions).

Please let me know if this is not a reasonable approach.

Thanks,

Sharon 

-----Original Message-----
From: netconf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces at ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00)
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:41 PM
To: netconf at ietf.org
Subject: [Netconf] Comments on Monitoring Draft

Hi

1. If the statistics are limited to NETCONF traffic, this should be
clarified in the description clauses. Since we discuss CLI sessions in
another part of the data model, this is not completely obvious.

2. For consistency with other NETCONF specifications, the protocol
operation definition should be broken out separately from the content
definition.

3. Should any of the parameters to the <get-schema> verb be optional?
Currently they are all mandatory. If my device only has XSDs, do I
really have to specify this parameter every single time?

Sharon Chisholm
Nortel
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf