Re: [Netconf] capability exchange
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Netconf] capability exchange

Andy Bierman writes:
>IMO, the NETCONF database
>transaction model (including partial locking) is somewhat amateurish.
>It's got more holes in it than Swiss cheese.

Not sure how to parse this, since IMHO the NETCONF database transaction
model does not include partial locking.  If you do partial locking,
then you can't use the 4741 transaction model.  There's no overlap.

Thanks,
 Phil

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.