Re: [Netconf] capability exchange

[Andy Bierman <andy at netconfcentral.com>]

Phil Shafer wrote:
> Andy Bierman writes:
>> IMO, the NETCONF database
>> transaction model (including partial locking) is somewhat amateurish.
>> It's got more holes in it than Swiss cheese.
> 
> Not sure how to parse this, since IMHO the NETCONF database transaction
> model does not include partial locking.  If you do partial locking,
> then you can't use the 4741 transaction model.  There's no overlap.
> 

Well, partial-lock works fine for editing <running>,
but if <candidate> or <startup> is supported
on the agent, then you cannot use it.  Batting .333
is good in baseball, but maybe not here :-)


> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 

Andy