Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup

To: Andy Bierman <andy at netconfcentral.com>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
From: Phil Shafer <phil at juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:58:16 -0400
Cc: NETCONF <netconf at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: netconf at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4A5E0300.7030402 at netconfcentral.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Andy Bierman writes:
>It seems to me that the requirements for :confirmed-commit
>preclude any possible concurrent support for the :startup
>capability.

They are orthogonal.  The only thing that affects <startup/> is
<copy-config/>, so your commit confirmed operation should only be
affecting <running/>.

Thanks,
 Phil

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
  - From: Andy Bierman

References:
- [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
  - From: Andy Bierman

Prev by Date: Re: [Netconf] draft-cole-netconf-robust-config-01
Next by Date: Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
Previous by thread: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
Next by thread: Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Netconf] :confirmed-commit and :startup

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.