Re: [Netconf] [NETCONF] <get-schema> mandatory parms discussion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Netconf] [NETCONF] <get-schema> mandatory parms discussion



WashamFan wrote:
>> Mark Scott wrote:
>>> Martin and Andy,
>>>
>>> Agreed we can make <format> and <version> optional so long as the server
>>> returns an error if more than one entry exists with the same
>>> <identifier>.
>>
>> IMO, if <version> is empty, then the server needs to pick a version.
>> It SHOULD be the most recent version (perhaps MUST).
> 
> Or the version the server supports? Did you imply
> no "data-not-unique" error is returned when the parameters are 
> missing, instead, the server will use defaults when the parameters
> are missing?

Of course the server only returns revisions that it supports.
It would return the most recent revision date of the schema list
entries it has in its /netconf-state/schemas subtree.


> 
> washam
> 

Andy

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.