Re: [Netconf] We're done: Partial-lock-11 is the latest and final version

[Andy Bierman <andy at netconfcentral.com>]

Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
> Dear Netconf WG participants,
>  
> you have all seen the responses that Balazs made to the 5 ADs
> who held a DISCUSS. As a result, balzs did a new rev 11 to address
> a small (in my view rather) editorial fix. The text was also in the
> response from Alexey.
>  
> This coming Thursday, the IESG has a telechat.
> I would urge any WG participant who thinks that there are still issues to
> bring them up before Thursday 22nd of October (so today or Wednesday). 
>  
> If we do not get any, then I hereby declare consensus and ask our AD to
> move the document into the RFC-Editor queue.
>  

I reviewed the diffs between -09 to -10, and -10 to -11.
Looks good to me.  All my concerns have been addressed.

thanks,
Andy

> Thanks to Balazs and Martin!
>  
> Bert Wijnen
> co-chair of NETCONF WG
> partial loack document shepherd.
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
>     *From:* Balazs Lengyel <mailto:balazs.lengyel at ericsson.com>
>     *To:* netconf mailing list <mailto:netconf at ietf.org>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:32 PM
>     *Subject:* [Netconf] Partial-lock updates -10 and -11
> 
>     Hello,
>     The partial-lock draft was updated due to the IESG review.
> 
>     One major change: removal of the candidate and startup
>     configurations from the scope of the
>     partial-lock.
> 
>     All other changes are minor clarifications.
> 
>     Balazs
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf