Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default

To: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel at ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
From: Phil Shafer <phil at juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:03:31 -0400
Cc: netconf mailing list <netconf at ietf.org>, netmod at ietf.org
Delivered-to: netconf at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4ADF3090.7090903 at ericsson.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Balazs Lengyel writes:
>I have the feeling that we should make with-defaults MANDATORY for all nodes using YANG.
>(Currently report-all is the only mode that is mandatory to support in with-defaults.)
>Opinions?

I disagree.  There's nothing in YANG that requires with-defaults.

Thanks,
 Phil

References:
- Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
  - From: Balazs Lengyel

Prev by Date: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
Next by Date: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
Previous by thread: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
Next by thread: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Netconf] [netmod] meaning of default

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.