Re: [netext] [Netext] roaming issue-proposed text for roamingsection

[Qin Wu <sunseawq at huawei.com>]

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Koodli, Rajeev" <rkoodli at starentnetworks.com>
To: <netext at ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [netext] [Netext] roaming issue-proposed text for roamingsection


> 
> 
>> > I do not think we need to design signaling for exchanging this
> policy, 
>> > with or without roaming.
>> 
>> [Qin]: Okay, that is to say information exchange between MAG 
>> and LMA is required, But the information is not necessary to 
>> be taken as any policy. am I right?
> 
> Not sure what you mean. The signaling is for establishing localized
> routing, which is subject to policy constraints.
> We do not design policy exchange signaling here. 

[Qin]: That's what I understand. 
Actually policies can be exchanged through out of band signaling ,e.g.,AAA signaling.

>> > Since LMA is the control entity, we can assume it to exert such
> policy 
>> > control by instructing the MAG to provide localized routing.
>> 
>> [Qin]: I am wondering whether instructing the MAG to or not 
>> to provide localized routing (i.e., enable/disable localized 
>> routing) can be viewed as *policy*?
> 
> The trigger for LMA to initiate LR could be policy, yes.

[Qin]: Agree.

> -Rajeev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext