[netext] Issue with I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-lr-ps-00

[<Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com>]

Hello,

Regarding the scope of localized routing for PMIP6, I believe the
current PS I-D has some issues w.r.t the following:

1. Localized routing for IPv4 HoA (Sec 3.3.1)
I do not believe we should work on supporting LR for IPv4 HoA at this
time. Given the possibility of multiple MNs with the same IPv4 HoA
(RFC1918 addresses) in a PMIP6 domain, we will be bogged down on this
capability. Lets just worry about LR for only the IPv6
prefix/address. 

2. Transport network between the MAGs (Sec 3.3.2)
Rather than making assumptions about the capability of MAGs in a PMIP6
domain, and defining negotiation mechanisms, we can make an assumption
that MAGs support IPv6 transport. Keeping the scope constrained will
ensure we get something done here.

So I would recommend (with chair hat on) that we delete secs 3.3,
3.3.1 and 3.3.2. 

-Chairs