Hi Ahmad, Do I read you mail correctly that you do support the draft to become WG item and thus, the basis for the work? As accepting a draft as WG item is the start of the WG work, I guess your concerns are basis of normal discussion for the WG to proceed when the draft is accepted. Cheers, Jonne. On 10/14/09 5:15 PM, "Ahmad Muhanna" <amuhanna at nortel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I read the draft and I believe, conceptually, the draft can work as a > base to fulfill the LMA redirection WG item. However, I see few things > in the draft that are beyond the scope of this WG charter "LMA > Redirection" item: > > 1. > Allowing redirection during re-registration does not make sense. > It is not within the scope of load balancing nor, after some short > discussion with the authors, there is a strong usecase for it to be > included. > 2. > The draft demotes the use of IKEv2 for establishing the IPsec > between the MAG and LMA from "SHOULD" to "MAY". I also, believe that > this is not appropriate for the support of this functionality to > override RFC5213 requirements. It seems that there is some concern about > IPSec failing after the BCE has been created in the r2LMA but that > concern can be addressed without the proposed demotion/change. > 3. > The draft proposes a new error code to basically indicate to the > MAG to use redirection functionality. Since, the LMA sends the new error > code without a previous knowledge of whether the MAG is a legacy one or > not, this cause value is NOT backward compatible. A proposal to use one > of the error codes in RFC5213, should address this concern and be > acceptable. > > Regards, > Ahmad > > > ________________________________ > > From: netext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces at ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:36 AM > To: netext at ietf.org > Subject: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D: > draft-korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc > > > > > Hello, > > One of the Netext WG milestones is: > Sep 2009 Initial WG draft on LMA Redirection > > At IETF75, I-D draft-korhonen-netext-redirect was accepted as > the > baseline to be adopted as the doc. Process requires that we also > run > the consensus call on the WG ML. > > The I-D: Runtime LMA Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6, > draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt has now been posted and > this is > a consensus call for its adoption as WG doc. > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt > <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt> > > Please respond by Oct 15th, 09. > > -Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Siemens Networks Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: jonne.soininen at nsn.com
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.