Re: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D: draft-korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc

["Ahmad Muhanna" <amuhanna at nortel.com>]

Hi Jonne,
Agreed!

Regards,
Ahmad
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soininen, Jonne (NSN - FI/Espoo) 
> [mailto:jonne.soininen at nsn.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:31 AM
> To: Muhanna, Ahmad (RICH1:2H10); Basavaraj Patil; netext at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D: 
> draft-korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc
> 
> Hi Ahmad,
> 
> Do I read you mail correctly that you do support the draft to 
> become WG item and thus, the basis for the work?
> 
> As accepting a draft as WG item is the start of the WG work, 
> I guess your concerns are basis of normal discussion for the 
> WG to proceed when the draft is accepted.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jonne.
> 
> On 10/14/09 5:15 PM, "Ahmad Muhanna" <amuhanna at nortel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > I read the draft and I believe, conceptually, the draft can 
> work as a 
> > base to fulfill the LMA redirection WG item. However, I see 
> few things 
> > in the draft that are beyond the scope of this WG charter "LMA 
> > Redirection" item:
> > 
> > 1. 
> > Allowing redirection during re-registration does not make sense.
> > It is not within the scope of load balancing nor, after some short 
> > discussion with the authors, there is a strong usecase for it to be 
> > included.
> > 2. 
> > The draft demotes the use of IKEv2 for establishing the 
> IPsec between 
> > the MAG and LMA from "SHOULD" to "MAY". I also, believe 
> that this is 
> > not appropriate for the support of this functionality to override 
> > RFC5213 requirements. It seems that there is some concern 
> about IPSec 
> > failing after the BCE has been created in the r2LMA but 
> that concern 
> > can be addressed without the proposed demotion/change.
> > 3. 
> > The draft proposes a new error code to basically indicate 
> to the MAG 
> > to use redirection functionality. Since, the LMA sends the 
> new error 
> > code without a previous knowledge of whether the MAG is a 
> legacy one 
> > or not, this cause value is NOT backward compatible. A 
> proposal to use 
> > one of the error codes in RFC5213, should address this 
> concern and be 
> > acceptable.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Ahmad
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: netext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com
> > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:36 AM
> > To: netext at ietf.org
> > Subject: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D:
> > draft-korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > One of the Netext WG milestones is:
> > Sep 2009                  Initial WG draft on LMA Redirection
> > 
> > At IETF75, I-D draft-korhonen-netext-redirect was accepted as the 
> > baseline to be adopted as the doc. Process requires that we 
> also run 
> > the consensus call on the WG ML.
> > 
> > The I-D: Runtime LMA Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6, 
> > draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt has now been posted 
> and this is 
> > a consensus call for its adoption as WG doc.
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt
> > <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt>
> > 
> > Please respond by Oct 15th, 09.
> > 
> > -Chairs
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > netext mailing list
> > netext at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> 
> --
> Jonne Soininen
> Nokia Siemens Networks
> 
> Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
> E-mail: jonne.soininen at nsn.com
> 
> 
>