Hi Sure, I know your question. In my mind, we can use this mid-session redirection associated with bulk-re-registration. Therefore, the LMA can perform redirection per MAG. In such case, the operation time will be short. In addtion, LMA can notify MAG the maintenance operation by out-of-band means. The path failure is another scenario describe how to redirect mobility sessions. Maybe somebody has different thought on mid-session redireciton scenario. BR Jinwei > Hi, > > Well, which operational maintenance you have in mind which wait > for the per-mobility session re-registration to come by to > announce that hey.. we are having maintenance here, please go > somewhere else? Also, how long that maintenance operation will last? > > May be you can clarify that one, first. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Ahmad > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: netext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Jinwei Xia > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:36 AM > To: 'MELIA TELEMACO'; Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com; netext at ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-korhonen- > netext-redirect as WG doc > > > Hi Telemaco, > > I think mid-session redirection scenario makes some sense and > should be taken into account. Some reasons have been given in > section 4.2 of "draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-ps-00" (e.g. > maintenance operation, abrupt change of load condition etc). There > is some other mid-redirection scenario, for example, the failure > of path between MAG and rfLMA can result in all mobility sessions > of the MNs attached on the MAG corrupt. These sessions should be > correctly redirected to r2LMA to mitigate avalanche. > > > BR > Jinwei > > > > ________________________________ > > From: netext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netext- > bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of MELIA TELEMACO > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:56 AM > To: Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com; netext at ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D:draft- > korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc > > > > Hi, > > > > I support the adoption of this ID. I wonder however if > the mid-session redirection described in section 5.5.2 brings more > advantages than complexity. The authors may want to comment on this. > > > > Thanks, > > Telemaco > > > > > ________________________________ > > > De : netext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netext- > bounces at ietf.org] De la part de Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com > Envoyé : jeudi 8 octobre 2009 14:36 > ? : netext at ietf.org > Objet : [netext] Consensus call to adopt I-D: draft- > korhonen-netext-redirect as WG doc > > > > > > Hello, > > > > One of the Netext WG milestones is: > > Sep 2009 Initial WG draft on LMA Redirection > > > > At IETF75, I-D draft-korhonen-netext-redirect was > accepted as the > > baseline to be adopted as the doc. Process requires that > we also run > > the consensus call on the WG ML. > > > > The I-D: Runtime LMA Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile > IPv6, > draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt has now been posted > and this is > > a consensus call for its adoption as WG doc. > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-netext-redirect-04.txt > > > > Please respond by Oct 15th, 09. > > > > -Chairs > > > >
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.